Issue the issue is whether or not the forum selection clause in. Um law course catalog view course the legal environment. Only after purchasing their tickets from the travel agent did the shutes receive paper tickets containing a form contract with a forum selection clause requiring all disputes to be brought in florida. Its logo is the funnel like the funnels found on its ships, with red, white, and blue colors. The shutes are residents of the state of washington and the back of the ticket it states that the person who accepts the ticket is agreeing to have all matters litigated in the state of florida. Shore excursion best price guarantee guests sailing on a carnival cruise who book a shore excursion through us can be completely confident they are getting the best price and best value with the introduction of a new shore excursion. Knapp being no expert in the niceties of constitutional law, my first impulse was to decline the invitation to take part in this symposium devoted to decisions of the united states supreme court. The defendantappellee, carnival cruise lines, is a panamanian corporation with its principal place of business in miami, florida. The entire wikipedia with video and photo galleries for each article.
Knapp being no expert in the niceties of constitutional law, my first impulse was to decline the invitation to take part in this symposium devoted to decisions of. The cruise ship news iphone app has been founded for those passionate about cruising, which is a good source for the latest news on ships, destinations, ports of call, cruise deals, planning and for feedback on cruise lines. Sep 18, 20 the cruise ship way carnival cruise lines, inc. Equitable tolling is a legal theory to extend the statute of limitations in certain situations and is applied sparingly. Carnival cruise lines case study example topics and well. Legal issues relevant to cruise ships cruise research. Our best price guarantee ensures you get the best price. Federal court to decide on blocking carnival ships from u. A qualitative study of victimization and legal issues relevant to cruise ships caitlin e. The washington supreme court, in turn, held that jurisdiction over defendant existed under washingtons long arm statute, see shute v. Carnival cruise lines v shute et vir case study example. It owns no property in washington, maintains no office or bank account in washington and pays no business taxes in washington. Respondents filed suit against petitioner in the united states district court for the western district of washington, claiming that mrs.
He the attorney had us bring the ticket book victims friends name and i. Forumselection clauses forcing individuals to agree to submit to jurisdiction in a particular place are enforceable so long as they pass the test for judicial fairness. Carnival players club the carnival players club is a unique casino program that offers something for every level of player. In 1991, the united state supreme court made several rulings that remain the law today porter, 2006, p. Accordingly, we are bound to follow our decision in bailey v. Carnival is ranked first on the list of largest cruise lines based on passengers carried annually and total number of. Shute was injured while on the cruise off the coast of mexico, brought suit against carnival, but carnival had a clause in their tickets that all litigation would be handled in floridathere principal place of business. While the ship was in international waters off the mexican coast, respondent eulala shute was injured when she slipped on a deck mat during a guided tour of the ships galley. Forumselection clauses and the privitization of procedure. The shutes bought cruise tickets through a travel agent in washington. Jun 07, 20 shute was injured while on the cruise off the coast of mexico, brought suit against carnival, but carnival had a clause in their tickets that all litigation would be handled in floridathere principal place of business. Carnival cruise line is an international cruise line with headquarters in doral, florida. The ticket that she had purchased contained a passenger contract with a forum selection clause, providing that florida would be the forum for any disputes arising from the contract.
Appellants eulala and russel shute are washington residents who purchased ocean cruise fares from carnival through a snohomish county travel agency in march 1986. The terms and conditions in dickson productions website. Find great deals and specials on caribbean, the bahamas, alaska, and mexico cruises. That opinion was subsequently withdrawn, however, and the case was referred to the supreme court of washington for decision of certified question. Shute, live in the state of washington and they had purchased passage for a pleasure cruise on a ship owned by the petitioner, carnival cruise lines.
Smooth sailing navigating the sea of law applicable to the cruise. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit 586 richard k. The shutes paid the fare to the agent, who forwarded the payment to carnival s headquarters. May 17, 2004 this is so when the agreement concerns venue within a judicial system, see carnival cruise lines, inc. Carnival cruise injury claim miami boat accident lawyer. She and her husband then sued the carnival cruise line, alleging negligence by carnival s employees and seeking damages for her.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Case opinion for us supreme court carnival cruise lines, inc. Shute3 upheld the validity of the clause, requiring mrs. Ports on june 24 by daniel mccarthy april 12, 2019 the court is alleging carnival corp.
According to the us supreme courts decision in the case, carnival cruise lines, inc. Shutes injuries had been caused by the negligence of carnival cruise lines and its employees. Civil procedure 109 consent as a substitute for power carnival cruise lines, inc. Introduction forum selection clauses have become common additions to business agreements and play an important role in those agreements. Forumselection clauses forcing individuals to agree to submit to jurisdiction in a particular place. Such clauses provide that the litigation of any dispute arising out of the agreement shall be initiated exclusively in the. Dec 22, 2017 in this admiralty case we primarily consider whether the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit correctly refused to enforce a forumselection clause contained in tickets issued by petitioner carnival cruise lines, inc. Last term, the supreme court in carnival cruise lines, inc. The contract which was attached to the ticket stated that the forum for litigation would be florida. On the back of the tickets was a forumselection clause, stating that all disputes should be litigated in the state of florida. Carnival, is a panamanian corporation with its principal place of business in florida. Apr 12, 2019 federal court to decide on blocking carnival ships from u.
Carnival cruise lines inc v shute brief free download at. After the respondents shute, a washington state couple, purchased passage on a ship owned by petitioner, a floridabased cruise line, petitioner sent them tickets containing a clause designating courts in florida as the agreedupon fora for the resolution of disputes. Factual background edit the respondents, the shutes, was a couple from the state of washington that purchased cruise tickets through a local travel agent for a 7day cruise on the petitioners ship, the tropicale. Shute handily wins the honor as the worst nonobvious, nonconstitutional supreme court decision ever.
After the respondents shute, a washington state couple, purchased passage on a ship owned by petitioner, a floridabased cruise line, petitioner sent them. The titanic of worst decisions, nevada law journal. Course materials will be available for purchase at the law library copy center located in room b207. Shute1 handily wins the honor as the worst nonobvious, nonconstitutional supreme court decision ever. From gaming lessons for beginners to establishing credit lines and betting. Cruise line companies are registered under several countries in which laws differ in. Supreme court holds forum selection clauses are generally enforceable. Shute to litigate her claim, if at all, in florida.
Burke university of florida abstract the purpose of this project was to conduct a qualitative study examining the litigation process of u. The official facebook page of carnival cruise line. Shutes, through arlington, wa travel agent, purchased 7day cruise on carnival ship named tropicale shutes paid agent for tickets, agent forwarded pymt to c. Carnival argues that plaintiffs tickets contain a florida selection clause the enforceability of which was recently upheld by the supreme court in carnival cruise lines, inc.
Shute slipped and fell on a deck mat on a carnival cruise ship off the coast of mexico. Carnivals great vacation guarantee were 100% certain youre going to have a great time. She brought a personal injury claim in washington, where she was a resident. Mullenix hands down incontestably, carnival cruise lines, inc. What was the name of the carnival cruise lines case.
Shute attached and be ready to discuss same during the first class session. Since a cruise ship passenger is otherwise competent to contract away that choice of forum see carnival cruise lines, inc. A summary and case brief of carnival cruise lines, inc. Golf excursions we offer golf excursions in select ports of call. Eulala and russel shute plaintiffs purchased tickets through a travel agent in washington state for a cruise operated by carnival cruise lines, inc. The forumselection clause, as printed in the ticketpassenger contract, mandated that. She and her husband then sued the carnival cruise line, alleging.
Start studying business law exam 1 auburn university cochran. Carnival has no offices and no exclusive agents in washington, it is not registered to do business there, and it. Consistent with this task and guidelines, this essay suggest that hands down incontestably, carnival cruise lines, inc. Shutes o assented to the provisions of the contract of the forumselection.
Shute, carnival and other cruise lines have discretion to litigate in florida because the corporation is headquartered and operates there. We use this information to process your transaction, complete and ship your purchase, book and confirm your travel itinerary, communicate with you and those. Weve hand selected the best local shore excursions so you can experience the most out of every port. Carnival cruise deals and cruise packages to the most popular destinations. In 2018 carnival cruise line was estimated to hold an 8. The shutes had purchased carnival cruise tickets in washington through a travel agent. The supreme court has now held that the business activities of the cruise line in the state of washington permits the assertion of jurisdiction. Justia blawg search law blogs, lawyer blogs, legal blogs. Lower court united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. Business law exam 1 auburn university cochran flashcards. The validity of the terms of a contract for a cruise turn on federal principles of maritime law see carnival cruise lines, inc. Consumer protection for forum selection smu scholar. Forum selection clauses contained in form passage contracts are subject to judicial scrutiny for. On the ticket, there was a forum selection clause that said any litigation related to the cruise must be tried in florida.
Carnival cruise lines, united states court of appeals, ninth circuit. Not only is the decision profoundly anticonsumer, but it bears no conceivable relationship to the way real people live. Justice stevens, with whom justice marshall joins, dissenting. See carnival cruise lines, your daily guide to fun, nov. The court prefaces its legal analysis with a factual statement that implies that a purchaser of a carnival cruise lines passenger ticket is fully and fairly notified about the existence of the choice of forum clause in the fine print on the back of the ticket. Carnival s contacts with the state of washington are insufficient to support an exercise of general jurisdiction. The paper carnival cruise lines v shute et vir case is a brilliant example of a case study on law.
1244 576 1307 357 821 1233 1405 442 1338 1174 787 156 1018 1430 1518 440 121 587 621 99 819 306 1175 590 434 1243 475 1403 197 620 1308 325 610 647 843 279 479 27 473 1081 447 141 125